The right of each person ends up in powers forcibly majority gives the rest of the community. The practice has been accepted collectively is a fundamental factor in deploying our strategy of personal morality.
ignore that consecrates us as revolutionaries, which can range from the merely unusual to criminal.
When we say good manners, we are talking about collective acceptance. Would ideally be a thorough analysis of the customs on the basis of scientific or analytically convenient, but we all know that the collective consciousness is somehow imposed on personal conduct.
Understanding this can help better balance the trend to "Be Free" and better understand the concept of liberty, like choosing where to begin to be free.
If we decide to be free to say whatever we want when we are weak, have less chance of success, or that our success is meaningful if we and deliberate self-governing, and we hope to have a position or situation of greater strength to express our disagreement. The mere fact of being able to govern ourselves, is a truer measure of freedom, personal mastery, self-control, self-possession and driving.
Indeed, the very concept of freedom is to discern, far more as we can determine what really suits us, and opt for it. For example, there is more freedom in who calls him / herself to eat what you should eat, that he can not feel free exemplary self-government and away from what you should not eat.
Obviously, we revealed the connection between freedom, conscience, convenience, and ultimately self-government, precisely because these qualities make one quality inseparable package of freedom. In this scenario
discover our identity in the various circles of our being:
1 .- Intimate
2 .- Private
3 .- Group,
4 .- Social and
World
5 .- 6 .- Historical.
What really convenient? The answer to this question is a package of actions for each circle.
Who really wants to be free should then see your entire being and identity to assimilate multi-circular, or multi-level within the social.
is unproductive and even dangerous to try to be only part of what we really are, and thus neglecting other edges and carriers of our identity.
José Manuel Fernández Núñez.
Dominican lawyer and thinker.
http://www.lulu.com/browse/search.php?search_forum=-1&search_cat=2&show_results=topics&return_chars=200&search_keywords=&keys=&fSearch=jose+manuel+fernandez & ; fSearchFamily = 0
0 comments:
Post a Comment