means that the average life is the form or manner by which a person earns the money to pay for themselves and their own.
This is a great contradiction, besides being unconstitutional. The Human Being should not need anything foreign to his own dignity as a person and as a citizen to access everything for Human Rights Principles will ensure life and sustenance.
The livelihood is normally understood as a job or means of production must only be a moral control of access to necessary support, an activator of Rights, not a payer of Human Rights.
In the system proposed in my book "What the poor want to know", I argue that the human being must be provided with all that human rights will allow, without the need for what occurs in the form of money for their work enough to pay it.
say as St. Paul said, "who does not work do not eat", but not to give to each according to his worth in money work, but based on what is worth what you really need them, at work as justifying or indicator of a city owned and strives for a society.
This same sociaedad should try to cover their mistakes against the city, in many ways, such as providing educational, social service, and course work. If we analyze it thoroughly, not the fault of a citizen who does not exist in your country or community employment in the quantity and quality needed. However, society will never be released from duty of Human Rights to provide services to its citizens.
Work should be a show an active participation in the maintenance of society, but should not be something that measures a person's dignity.
I have solutions for this in my book.
Thanks, José Manuel Fernández
Núñez.
Dominican lawyer and thinker.
http://www.lulu.com/browse/search.php?search_forum=-1&search_cat=2&show_results=topics&return_chars=200&search_keywords=&keys=&fSearch=jose+manuel+fernandez & ; fSearchFamily = 0
http://www.eumed.net/libros/2006a/jmfn/index.htm
http://www.eumed.net/ce/2007a/jmfn.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment