Yesterday the tortuous path of the "Law Sinde and ended up being adopted in Congress with the support of political parties.
The famous rule up discussions from different fields, but the most fervent was produced by people who defend Internet freedom, being the most important means of distributing content or information that currently exists.
few weeks ago I wrote a post where I questioned the changes that can occur in our thinking through the use of internet and new communication technologies in everyday life. Certainly not the only change that contributes to society in cyberspace. This year has started with the fundamental characteristic of the use of social networks to trigger political change.
North of Africa has resounded through the union of cyber through Facebook or Twitter. First was Tunisia, which was followed by Egypt and now appear revolutionary sparks against totalitarian governments of countries such as Libya and Morocco.
Like most cultural advances, the world of internet has pros and cons .. On the one hand, things can become focused on superficial and meaningless experiences with little capacity for reflection, but on the other, allow us to communicate more easily, unity and strength by giving us an important set of people.
Without discussing the content of the law Sinde, one can draw many conclusions from the attitude of the politicians who devised and the ways in which they fought for its passage. At all times it seemed more important to maintain control over the "dangerous" group of the Internet to find a viable model for economic development of intellectual property assets on the Internet.
Every human being devoid of the slightest freedom fight for it, in any way possible. If Internet is a way, it will remain so, although some seek to avoid it.
The famous rule up discussions from different fields, but the most fervent was produced by people who defend Internet freedom, being the most important means of distributing content or information that currently exists.
few weeks ago I wrote a post where I questioned the changes that can occur in our thinking through the use of internet and new communication technologies in everyday life. Certainly not the only change that contributes to society in cyberspace. This year has started with the fundamental characteristic of the use of social networks to trigger political change.
North of Africa has resounded through the union of cyber through Facebook or Twitter. First was Tunisia, which was followed by Egypt and now appear revolutionary sparks against totalitarian governments of countries such as Libya and Morocco.
Like most cultural advances, the world of internet has pros and cons .. On the one hand, things can become focused on superficial and meaningless experiences with little capacity for reflection, but on the other, allow us to communicate more easily, unity and strength by giving us an important set of people.
Without discussing the content of the law Sinde, one can draw many conclusions from the attitude of the politicians who devised and the ways in which they fought for its passage. At all times it seemed more important to maintain control over the "dangerous" group of the Internet to find a viable model for economic development of intellectual property assets on the Internet.
Every human being devoid of the slightest freedom fight for it, in any way possible. If Internet is a way, it will remain so, although some seek to avoid it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment