Gloryhole In Stckport

social science that studies the human need for goods and services to optimize their solution.

The economy is not statistics or mathematics, but science uses to measure these phenomena and processes of the human need for goods and services. It is a very strong trend, the focus on measuring the current processes rather than to propose policy changes.

The main function of the economy is of strategic type, that is, propose solutions. For this we use estimates of all kinds, but such calculations are not the spirit of the economy, but the means by which we arrive at our conclusions.

The true or principal job of the economist is to confront the problem of human need with a systemic perspective, and for this we turn to the various sciences to support the proposed solutions.

economist, as a professional, he works in the following markets:

1 .- Process Improvement:

a. - Reducing costs,

b. - Increase in benefits.

c. - Adjustments ethical processes.

2 .- Quality of the products.

3 .- Consumer Psychology.

4 .- Defining equations of the consumption processes

a. - Measurement of consumer variables.

b. - Definition of strategies in the processes of production, distribution, brokerage and consumer.

5 .- Solutions to macro and micro level, public and private.

sometimes confuse a good mathematician of the economy as it is a real economist, because we let ourselves be impressed by his equations, although they have not reached the subject of the economy that is strategy. It is important to look into the measurement variables and perspectives of the problems, define the profile of these, but that's like discovering that there are many poor in the world, and measure the causes and not to propose solutions. The work is unfinished.

If we measure causes of problems, we can also measure the effect of these and the effect of the hypotheses proposed as a solution. That completes the job.

is an error, discard solutions in the fields of economy, having no statistical or mathematical studies in-law the subject of the economy is finding solutions, not mathematics. An economist who receives hypothesis solutions to problems and shortages need to take the important and assess what they can contribute constructively. This is to be respectful and avoid losing important thing because of what is not fundamental.

In underdeveloped countries, authors and researchers do not have the funds to pay for measures of data collection or sampling differences that warrant their research and contributions. In that sense many of the investigations should be weighted by the essential, ie the strategy and proposed changes. Then, to be considered for a process of justification or falsification, we can proceed with it.

For process improvement, the economist is experiencing one of the most important ethical challenges because it must defend the quality of the product, the human rights of those who produce it, and its consumers. It is an unethical act any recommendations affecting the human rights of workers for lower costs. That's where the ethics of borders economist with the requirements of the theory of fair trade.

No studies or recommendations of a professional that respects the economy may go in favor of producers who lose money, but also for consumers to have to pay a profit higher than the industry average. And I personally believe that after securing the costs, all net income above 10% should be reviewed. The exceptions are well known, those who are affected by the opportunity cost that must also be reviewed with ethical criteria.