What went wrong in the foundations of traditional economic models? Luxury and Quality
Cuando los Seres Humanos logran entender su interdependencia forman sociedades y países, y en ese sentido pasan a ser los dueños de los países que constituyen.
Cada uno pudiera ser libre en la selva, pero renuncia a esa libertad salvaje para disfrutar de la libertad condicionada que le da esa nueva sociedad. Se trata de que entre todos se comprometen a cubrir los servicios y necesidades of all and trying to ensure a better life.
All these guidelines to ensure that better life in society are human rights, ie right to food, education, health, or rather to health services, to have shelter and clothing, etc.
All these services are called Service for Human Rights, BUT at some point in history was a failure, which damaged the agreement, this decision involved the use or misapplication of the ability to produce or generate money, this is a bad strategy for monetary issue.
The consequences of the monetary issue as we know is that it makes poor people until proven guilty, which almost always is forever. Being poor gets a little hard to bear. All prefer to be rich and that creates the degrading environment we see today.
In my book, "What the poor want to know", raised the necessary correction in the strategy of monetary, which allows it to be poor in peace, and therefore unnecessary to be rich, so that you're rich or poor just by calling.
This book presents the methodology of monetary Personal or EMP, which would allow mankind to exercise their human rights to live in peace. The book raises a number of further adjustments to the current economic model that allows sustainable social development, no inflation and no recession.
In the current model, not good to have human rights because, if you have money you can not pay your Services Human Rights and therefore have nothing. In the model I discuss in my book, human rights are an indivisible part of the person and nobody can remove them, and used your human rights as much for the Issuance Reserve Monetary Staff (EMP).
In my model, the money is issued to serve all citizens (rich and poor), so the process is free of the current trend of issuing money just to enrich the powerful.
Luck!, José Manuel Fernández http://reformulacion.blogspot.com/search ... http://www.eumed.net/libros/2006a/jmfn/i ...
http://interesantes.iespana.es/la_substancia_espacial.htm
http://www.polseguera.com/colaboracion/castella/substanciaespacial.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment